Intraregímenes políticos autoritarios en Rusia y el espacio postsoviético (análisis histórico-político comparativo).
Resumen
El artículo intenta aclarar la naturaleza de las características específicas de la adaptación del sistema político democrático a las condiciones tradicionalistas en el contexto de la investigación científica política comparada. Sobre la base de la experiencia histórica y política del imperio ruso, la Unión Soviética, la Federación de Rusia señaló que en Rusia y en algunos países de la CEI se ha formado una autoritaria-modernización de regímenes políticos presidenciales que la implementación de una misión poderosa y un estado fuerte puede contribuir a la aceleración de la ejecución de los programas de desarrollo. La definición propuesta de régimen político intrapolítico refleja el funcionamiento de configuraciones de poder más específicamente históricas dentro de los regímenes clásicos, generalmente de naturaleza autoritaria y presidencial en forma política y jurídica.
Citas
Akopov G.L., Denisov Yu.P. & Kislitsyn S.A. (2010) Political regimes and rulers in the history of Russia. Rostov-on-Don.
J. Arch Getty. (2016) Practicing Stalinism: Bolsheviks, Boyars, and the Persistence of Tradition. Moscow: ROSPEN
Baranov, N.A. (2007) The political regime of V. Putin // Russia’s political perspectives: Materials of the All-Russian Scientific Conference, Saratov, April 19-20, (In Russ.) // Saratov Socio-Economic Institute publishers, 2007:3-6. http://nicbar.ru/statia41.htm
Baranov, N.A. (2011) Political regimes of post-Soviet states // Materials of the faculty and students conference. St. Petersburg: Znanie, Ivesep,:149-154. from http://nicbar.ru/statia80.htm
Borisov, N. (2011) The institution of presidency in the Central Asian countries: personalization vs. institutionalization // Central Asia and the Caucasus, Vol.12, No. 4, Pp. 65-75
Distinctive features of the Baltic States regimes (In Russ.) // From http://www.stena.ee/blog/otlichitelnye-cherty-pribaltijskih-rezhimov
Durant W. & Durant A. Lecciones de historia. Patrones de desarrollo de la civilización durante 5000 años. Del Inglés. M. Mann, Ivanov y Ferber. 2020. P. 63.
Emirov, R.M. (2016) Features of the Evolution of the Political Regimes of the South Caucasus States // Political Science Issues, №1 (21): 90-07. From: souzpolitolog.ru›ru/vp_1_2016.php
Fokina L. (2017) Twenty-Year anniversary of sovereign Moldova. // Evolution of the post-Soviet space: past, present, and future. Мoscow, 66-70.
Isaev, B.A. (2013) The democratic trend in the political history of medieval Russia: political systems, institutions and factions // Proceedings on history of St. Petersburg University; №15: 29-42 (In Russ)
Khakimov R.S Khomenko V.V., Abdurakhmanov R.F. & Khusnutdinova A.T. (2013) Prospects for Russian Federalism in the 21st Century // Kazan.
Kislitsyn S.A. & Petrova S.V. (2017) On the political regime of modern Ukraine // Free Thought Magazine, №2: 33-45.
Kislitsyn S.A., Petrova S.V.& Terentyeva M.S. (2019) Authoritarianism and the presidency in the post-Soviet space . Sochi: Regional Integrated Center publishers
Kislitsyn S.A., Petrova. S.V.& Repinskaya O.V. (2016) Problems of Applied Geopolitics of Eurasia. Ed. S.A. Kislitsyn // Moscow, 416 p.
Kislitsyn, S.A. (1991) Russian authorities and the opposition, in 2 vols. Rostov-on- Don.
Kozhevnikova, Yu.S. (2008) Political and state regimes (correlation spectrum) // Bulletin of the Volga State Academy of Water Transport, №24: 86-92
Kudryavev, Yu.A. (2012) National regimes // St. Petersburg,
Kurskova, G. (2010). The political regime of the Russian Federation. The politico-legal analysis: Monograph. Moscow, from http://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01006527440
Lubsky, A.V. (1998) History of Russian political science. Comp. by S.A. Kislitsyn // Rostov-on- Don, (In Russ.)
Makarenko B. & Melville A. (2014); How and why democratic transit freezes. Postcommunist lessons // Political science. Moscow: INION RAN publishers, №3: 18-19
Makarenko B. (2008). Post-Communist Transformation: Outcomes // ‘Politeia’ journal, № 3 (50):105-125
Mammadov, (2017) M. Features of the modernization of post-Soviet political regimes // Оbserver, №1. 5-32
Omarov K. (2018) Turkmenistan from Niyazov to Berdimuhamedov: paranoia and isolationism. From https://yenicag.ru/turkmenistan-ot-niyazova-do-berdymukha/274845/
Paigina, D.I. (2015) Political regime and prospects of its research in legal science. Journal of Russian Law, №11(227): 29-34. From https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25278751
Petras I. & Veitmeyer H. (2003). System in Crisis: The Dynamics of Free Market Capitalism. L. Zed. Books.
Popov, S.V. (2011) Russian Authority and Parliamentary Opposition in 2000th // ‘Politics and Society’ journal, 86-94.
Safaryan A. (2018) Personnel master class from Pashinyan. From https://ru.armeniasputnik.am/politics/20181016/15127617/ kadrovyj-master-klass-ot-pashinyana- borba-so-starym-rezhimom-ego-zhe-rukami.html
Seredenko S. Distinctive features of the Baltic regimes 2018. // From http://www.stena.ee/blog/otlichitelnye-cherty-pribaltijskih-rezhimov
Shipunov, G.V. (2011) Methodological foundations of using the political regime category in the context of the study of post-communist transformations. Bulletin of SevNTU, №13: 66-72. From https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?issueid=136638
Tsygankov, A.P. (1995) Modern Political Regimes: Structure, Typology, Dynamics. Moscow: Interpraks, (In Russ.)
Ukraine: the crisis of a political nation. from http://www.discred.ru/news/ukraina_ krizis_politicheskoj_nacii/2016-11-21-25066. (In Russ.) Accessed on 04/03/2017
Voskresensky, A.D. (2007) Political Systems and Models of Democracy in the East // Moscow, 136-137.
